a) What worked out best for me was to perpetually save and validate the code as I went along to prevent errors from compounding on each other. Having our practice site alongside really helped speed up the process.
b) My target audience is for fans of art or those who lean towards learning about color and art. Something like that. The age demographic would be from at least high school age to 50+. I tried making the colors reflect my choice in subject matter while not making them obnoxiously bright so other people don't have to worry about theoretically searing their eyes out.
c) Safari, Firefox and Google Chrome. Since my pc is broken at the moment, I couldn't test it in IE. The differences were pretty minimal.
d) Not much actually since my coding didn't venture very far from what we had been practicing in class. Most of the problems lay with class and ID selectors, forgetting that ID selectors can only be used once and making efficient class tags.
e) Validating is bittersweet. When there's an error, and you can't figure out what it is, naturally can get frustrating. When the coding is clean and valid however, it is surprisingly satisfying. I had a few errors here and there, but for the midterm so far, not a lot of issues.
f) Whenever we did hands on practice, I think worked the best for implementing coding and the meanings. Compounded with when we talked about the meanings for each tag, it really helped understand the language.
g) Midterm part 1: Website about the color Blue
No comments:
Post a Comment